All Issue

2019 Vol.10, Issue 3 Preview Page

General Article

Comparison of green building standards in the united states and china
Yi-Wei Ding1
,
Sungho Tae2*
,
Seungjun Roh3
1Student, Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University, Ansan City, South Korea
2Professor, Department of Architecture & Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University, Ansan City, South Korea
3Assistant Professor, School of Architecture, Kumoh National Institute of Technology, Gumi, South Korea
* Corresponding Author
30 September 2019. pp. 176-182
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

With the development of green buildings in China, the LEED green building rating standards are becoming familiar to the public and industry. This work analyzes the interpretation of the LEED evaluation system as applied to China. It includes a comparative analysis of the LEED and green building evaluation standards in the 2014 version, and analyzes the limitations in implementation in China. In reference to the successful experience of LEED, suggestions for improving Chinese green building evaluation standards are made.

Keywords
green building
LEED
evaluation standards
comparison
analysis
References
1
H. TIAN, H. ZHANG, and D. SUN, Development Status and Prospect of Green Building in Mainland China. Building Science, 28(4) (2012).
2
China Architecture & Building Press. 2016 Annual Report on China Building Energy Efficiency, (2016).
3
ShangHai The Ministry of Housing, 上海绿色建筑发展报告, (2018).
4
The Eleventh Five-Year Plan. Available at http://ghs.ndrc.gov, (2006).
5
ASGB. Available at http://www.cngb.org.cn/index.action, (2014).
6
Life Cycle Assessment. Available at https://en.wikipedia.org
7
The Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development, Available at http://www.mohurd.gov.cn, (2014).
8
USGBC. LEED V4. Available at https://new.usgbc.org/leed-v.
9
L.I. Xiangyang, Building Energy Efficiency and New Energy Utilization in Architectural Design, Building Energy Conservation, 45(8) (2018), pp. 113-114.
10
Chinese Green Building Evaluation Label. Available at http://www.cngb.org.cn.
11
Y. WANG, H. CHEN, and J. TENG, Status and Suggestion for the Incremental Costs of Green Certification Projects, Civil Engineeringand Management, 34(6) (2017), PP. 175-179.
12
USGBC. Available at http://cn.usgbc.org/articles/leed-numbers-16-years-steady- growth.
13
China Academy of Building Research, The Present and Future of LEED Project in China, (2012).
14
Huang Xiaomin, The Legislation of American Green Building and its Enlightenment to China, (2018).
15
Green Business Certification Inc.(GBCI). Available at https://gbci.or
Information
  • Publisher :Sustainable Building Research Center (ERC) Innovative Durable Building and Infrastructure Research Center
  • Publisher(Ko) :건설구조물 내구성혁신 연구센터
  • Journal Title :International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development
  • Volume : 10
  • No :3
  • Pages :176-182
  • Received Date : 2019-09-02
  • Accepted Date : 2019-09-27
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.22712/susb.20190018
Journal Informaiton International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development
Online Submission
  • scopus
  • NRF
  • KOFST
  • KISTI Current Status
  • KISTI Cited-by
  • crosscheck
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close