All Issue

2020 Vol.11, Issue 3 Preview Page

General Article


September 2020. pp. 153-173
Abstract


References
1 
UNEP, United Nations Environmental Program for Sustainable Buildings and Construction, 2018. available at: https://www.unenvironment.org/explore-topics/resource-efficiency/what-we-do/one-planet-network
2 
S. Kubba, Handbook of green building design and construction: LEED, BREEAM and Green Globes. 2017, Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
10.1016/B978-0-12-810433-0.00003-4
3 
D. Sartor, M.A. Piette, W. Tschudi, and S. Fok, Strategies for energy benchmarking in cleanrooms and laboratory-type facilities, 2000 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings (2000), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California.
4 
G. Bell, D. Sartor, and W. Mills, The Berkeley hood: Development and commercialization of an innovative high-performance laboratory fume hood, Progress and Research Status: 1995-September 2003, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Report LBNL-48982 (rev.), September 2003, available at: http://ateam.lbl.gov/ hightech/fumehood/doc/LBNL-48983_FY03.pdf
5 
M. Crosbie, Architecture for science. 2004, Victoria, Australia: The Images Publishing Group.
6 
E. Mills, G. Bell, D. Sartor, A. Chen, D. Avery, M. Siminovitch, S. Greenberg, G. Marton, A. de Almeida, and L. Eng Lock, Energy efficiency in California laboratory-type facilities, Application Team at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory's Center for Building Science (1996), available at: http://eetd.lbl.gov/mills/emills/pubs/ PDF/LabEnergy.pdf
10.2172/409878
7 
G. Sharp, "Laboratory energy use with demand-based control", in E. Dittrich, (Ed.), The sustainable laboratory handbook. 2015, Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH, pp. 351-362.
10.1002/9783527337095.ch28PMC4322187
8 
B. Brewer, A. Harris, and W. Thomann, Evaluation of energy performance changes related to hood sash best management practices, paper presented at Laboratories for the 21st Century Conference, Colorado (2003), available at: www.epa.gov/labs21century/
9 
J. Woolliams, M. Lloyd, and J. Spengler, The case for sustainable laboratories: first steps at Harvard University. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. 6(4) (2005), pp. 363-382.
10.1108/14676370510623856
10 
L. Matthiessen and P. Morris, Costing green: A comprehensive cost database and budgeting methodology, Davis Langdon, (2004), available at: https://www.usgbc.org/sites/default/files/Costing%20Green_A%20Comprehensive%20Cost%20Database%20and%20Budgeting%20Methodology.pdf
11 
P. Morris, and L. Matthiessen, Costing green revisited: Reexamining the feasibility and cost impact of sustainable design in the light of increased market adoption, Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat, CTBUH Research Paper (2007), available at: https://global.ctbuh.org/resources/papers/download/1242-cost-of- green-revisited-reexamining-the-feasability-and-cost-impact-of-sustainable-design-in-the-light-of-increased-market-adoption.pdf
12 
L. Lesniewski, M. Matthiessen, P. Morris, and S. Tepfer, The power of zero: Optimizing value for next generation green. 2013, Kansas City, MO: BNIM.
13 
G. Kats, L. Alevantis, A. Berman, E. Mills, J. Perlman, The costs and financial benefits of green buildings: A report to California's sustainable building taskforce. 2003, Sacramento, CA: California Sustainable Building Task Force.
14 
A. Amiri, J. Ottelin, and J. Sorvari, Are LEED-certified buildings energy-efficient in practice? Sustainability, 11(6) (2019), pp. 1672.
10.3390/su11061672
15 
K. Sullivan and H. Oates, H., Analysis of Arizona's LEED for New Construction population's credits. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138 (2012), pp. 1386-1393.
10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000525
16 
P. Wu et al., A comprehensive analysis of the credits obtained by LEED 2009 certified green buildings. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 68(Part 1) (2017), pp. 370-379.
10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.007
17 
P. Wu et al., Regional variations of credits obtained by LEED 2009 Certified green buildings-A country level analysis. Sustainability, 10 (2018).
10.3390/su10010020
18 
U. Berardi, Sustainability assessment in the construction sector: Rating system and rated buildings. Sustainable Development, 20(6) (2012).
10.1002/sd.532
19 
J. Todd, C. Pyke, and R. Tufts, Implications of trends in LEED usage: rating system design and market transformation. Building Research & Information, 41(4) (2013), pp. 384-400.
10.1080/09613218.2013.775565
20 
L. Silva and J. Ruwanpura, Review of the LEED points obtained by Canadian building projects. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 15(2) (2009), pp. 38-54.
10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(2009)15:2(38)
21 
S. Pushkar and O. Verbitsky, Silver and Gold LEED commercial interiors: Certified projects. Journal of Green Building, 14(3) (2019), pp. 95-113.
10.3992/1943-4618.14.3.95
22 
Y. Ahn, and A. Pearce, Green luxury: A case study of two green hotels. Journal of Green Building, 8(1) (2017), pp. 90-120.
10.3992/jgb.8.1.90
23 
J. Kim et al., Green Building Strategies for LEED certified Recreational Facilities. Journal of Green Building, 12(2) (2017), pp. 149-166.
10.3992/1943-4618.12.2.149
24 
S. Kubba. Green construction project management and cost oversight, 2010, Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
10.1016/B978-1-85617-676-7.00014-2
25 
Richärd+Bauer Architecture, Northern Arizona University Science and Health Building, (2017), available at: https://www.architectmagazine.com/project-gallery/northern-arizona-university-science-and-health-building_o (accessed 4 July 2020)
26 
S. Tepfer, Realizing next generation green: Project delivery and cost management strategies for high-performance buildings. 2013, The American Institute of Architects.
27 
M. Boubekri, Daylighting design: Planning strategies and best practice solutions. 2014, Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser.
10.1515/9783038214786PMC4031400
28 
D. Watch, Building type basics for research laboratories. 2008, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
29 
L. Herrig, H. Holdridge, B. Amos, and D. Thomson, Georgia Tech Engineered Biosystems Building, (2018), available at: https://www.hpbmagazine.org/georgia-tech-engineered-biosystems-building/ (accessed 4 July 2020)
30 
C. Carry, Georgia Tech Krone Engineered Biosystems Building, (2018), available at: https://www.architectmagazine.com/project-gallery/georgia-tech-krone-engineered-biosystems-building_o (accessed 4 July 2020)
31 
KlingStubbins, Sustainable design of research laboratories: Planning, design, and operation. 2010, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
32 
P. Dockx, "Lab ventilation and energy consumption", in E. Dittrich, (Ed.), The Sustainable Laboratory Handbook. 2015, Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH, pp. 363-378.
10.1002/9783527337095.ch29
33 
Mendler, S., Odell, W., and Lazarus, M.A., The HOK guidebook to sustainable design, 2005, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Information
  • Publisher :Sustainable Building Research Center (ERC) Innovative Durable Building and Infrastructure Research Center
  • Publisher(Ko) :건설구조물 내구성혁신 연구센터
  • Journal Title :International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development
  • Volume : 11
  • No :3
  • Pages :153-173
  • Received Date :2020. 07. 20
  • Accepted Date : 2020. 09. 22
Journal Informaiton International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development
  • NRF
  • KOFST
  • scopus
  • crosscheck
  • open access
  • orcid
  • KISTI Cited-by
  • KISTI Current Status
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close