All Issue

2024 Vol.15, Issue 2

General Article

30 June 2024. pp. 122-139
Abstract
References
1

D. Shach-Pinsly, Three Strategies of Urban Renewal for One National Outline Plan TAMA38: The Impact of Multiparametric Decision-Making on Neighborhood Regeneration. Architecture. 2(4) (2022), pp. 616-636.

10.3390/architecture2040033
2

M. Kharseh, C. Nageli, and H. Wallbaum, Identify Optimal Renovation Packages for Residential Buildings: A State-of-the-Art Computational Model. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 297(1) (2019).

10.1088/1755-1315/297/1/012018
3

K. Maltceva and S. Pridvizhkin, Technological, economic and legislative opportunities and barriers for panel apartment buildings energy efficient reconstruction in Russia. MATEC Web Conf. 279 (2019), p. 03003.

10.1051/matecconf/201927903003
4

J.W.N. Steenberg, P.J. Robinson, and A.A. Millward, The influence of building renovation and rental housing on urban trees. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 61(3) (2018), pp. 553-567.

10.1080/09640568.2017.1326883
5

A. Power, Housing and sustainability: Demolition or refurbishment?. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Urban Des. Plan. 163(4) (2010), pp. 205-216.

10.1680/udap.2010.163.4.205
6

J. Shi, X. Min, H. Si, D. Tang, and W. Miao, The Transition from housing demolition to conservation and renovation in Shanghai: Challenges and countermeasures. Land. 8(11) (2019).

10.3390/land8110175
7

S. Buessler, D. Badariotti, and C. Weber, Evaluating the complex governance arrangements surrounding energy retrofitting programs: The case of collective ownership buildings in France. Energy Research and Social Science. 32 (2017), pp. 131-148.

10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.007
8

M. Van Nguyen, T.T. Nguyen, C.T. Phan, and K.D. Ha, Sustainable redevelopment of urban areas: Assessment of key barriers for the reconstruction of old residential buildings. Sustain. Dev. no. September (2023), pp. 1-16.

10.1002/sd.2777
9

H. Ghaleb, H.H. Alhajlah, A.A. Bin Abdullah, M.A. Kassem, and M.A. Al-Sharaf, A Scientometric Analysis and Systematic Literature Review for Construction Project Complexity. Buildings. 12 (2022), p. 482.

10.3390/buildings12040482
10

S.Y. Kim and M. Van Nguyen, Mapping the Complexity of International Development Projects Using DEMATEL Technique. J. Manag. Eng. 37(2) (2021), p. 5020016.

10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000882
11

P.A. Jensen, E. Maslesa, and J.B. Berg, Sustainable building renovation: Proposals for a research agenda. Sustainability (Switzerland). 10(12) (2018).

10.3390/su10124677
12

R. Sundling and H. Szentes, Why are we not renovating more? An elaboration of the wicked problem of renovating apartment buildings. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems. 38(3) (2021). pp. 197-221.

10.1080/10286608.2021.1969371
13

Q. He, L. Luo, Y. Hu, and A.P.C. Chan, Measuring the complexity of mega construction projects in China-A fuzzy analytic network process analysis. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 33(3) (2015), pp. 549-563.

10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.07.009
14

A.T. Nguyen, L.D. Nguyen, L. Le-Hoai, and C.N. Dang, Quantifying the complexity of transportation projects using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 33(6) (2015), pp. 1364-1376.

10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.02.007
15

A. Kamari, R. Corrao, and P.H. Kirkegaard, Sustainability focused decision-making in building renovation. Int. J. Sustain. Built Environ. 6(2) (2017), pp. 330-350.

10.1016/j.ijsbe.2017.05.001
16

L. Malmgren, S. Elfborg, and K. Mjörnell, Development of a decision support tool for sustainable renovation - a case study. Struct. Surv. 34(1) (2016), pp. 3-11.

10.1108/SS-07-2015-0031
17

J. Palm and K. Reindl, Understanding energy efficiency in Swedish residential building renovation: A practice theory approach. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 11 (2016), pp. 247-255.

10.1016/j.erss.2015.11.006
18

Z.A. Jalil, H.I. Naji, and M.S. Mahmood, Developing sustainable alternatives from destroyed buildings waste for reconstruction projects. Civ. Eng. J. 6(1) (2020), pp. 60-68.

10.28991/cej-2020-03091453
19

J. Zhu and A. Mostafavi, Discovering complexity and emergent properties in project systems: A new approach to understanding project performance. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 35(1) (2017), pp. 1-12.

10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.10.004
20

T.Y. Chiang, Refurbishment criteria performance assessment methodologies based on a multiple-criteria approach. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment. 36(1) (2021). pp. 263-282.

10.1007/s10901-020-09752-6
21

M. Sonnleithner, New Opportunities for Increasing the Renovation Rate of Buildings. Architecture Papers of the Faculty of Architecture and Design STU. 26(1) (2021). pp. 2-9.

10.2478/alfa-2021-0002
22

A. Serrano-Jiménez, P. Femenías, L. Thuvander, and Á. Barrios-Padura, A multi-criteria decision support method towards selecting feasible and sustainable housing renovation strategies. Journal of Cleaner Production. 278 (2021).

10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123588
23

N.T. Quan, Model of cooperation (Hapdong) in reconstruction projects of old residential areas in Seoul, Korea and lessons learned for Vietnam, in Redeveloping urban public housing areas for inhabitants' better quality of life, 2014.

24

J. Li, S. Sun, and J. Li, The dawn of vulnerable groups: The inclusive reconstruction mode and strategies for urban villages in China. Habitat International. 110 (2021).

10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102347
25

S.-G. Park, Preference Analysis on the Reconstruction and Remodeling of Old Aged Apartment in Daejeon Area. J. Korean Recycl. Constr. Resour. Inst. 4(2) (2016), pp. 180-186.

10.14190/JRCR.2016.4.2.180
26

H. Liao, R. Ren, and L. Li, Existing Building Renovation: A Review of Barriers to Economic and Environmental Benefits. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 20(5) (2023).

10.3390/ijerph2005405836901068PMC10001863
27

K. Xu, G.Q. Shen, G. Liu, and I. Martek, Demolition of Existing Buildings in Urban Renewal Projects: A Decision Support System in the China Context. Sustain. 11 (2019), p. 491.

10.3390/su11020491
28

M. Botta, Towards Sustainable Renovation: Three research projects. School of Architecture. vol. Dissertati. (2005).

29

J. Kim, M. Brand, H.-S. Lee, and M.-S. Park, The Role of Construction Companies in the Reconstruction Process of Apartment Buildings in Korea. In Nineteenth annual pacific-rim real estate society conference. (2013), pp. 13-16.

30

J. Zhang and Y. Gao, From growth coalition to development coalition: A case study of urban renewal governance transformation in Southern Area of Nanjing (SAN), China. Trans. Plan. Urban Res. 11(1-2) (2022), pp. 66-85.

10.1177/27541223221115930
31

H.S. Shin and H.C. Yi, The Korean housing market: Its characteristics and policy responses. Hot property. (2019).

10.1007/978-3-030-11674-3_16
32

C.M. Liang, C.C. Lee, and L.R. Yong, Impacts of urban renewal on neighborhood housing prices: predicting response to psychological effects. J. Hous. Built Environ. 35(1) (2020), pp. 191-213.

10.1007/s10901-019-09673-z
33

J. Chen, Y. Chen, and L. Zheng, Research on the Way of Village Renovation and Renewal - Taking Cuiwei Historic District As an Example. Formosa J. Appl. Sci. 1(2) (2022), pp. 133-144.

10.55927/fjas.v1i2.822
34

K. Wang and Z.Y. Cao, Urban renewal evaluation for traditional neighborhoods based on sustainable community development rating system: A case study in Zhejiang, China. Lowl. Technol. Int. 17(1) (2015), pp. 53-58.

10.14247/lti.17.1_53
35

G.K. Pall, A.J. Bridge, S. Washington, J. Gray, and M. Skitmore, Critical delay factors in power transmission projects: a structural equation modeling approach. Int. J. Constr. Manag. 22(6) (2022), pp. 1158-1170.

10.1080/15623599.2019.1686835
36

M. Bosch-Rekveldt, Y. Jongkind, H. Mooi, H. Bakker, and A. Verbraeck, Grasping project complexity in large engineering projects: The TOE (Technical, Organizational and Environmental) framework. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 29(6) (2011), pp. 728-739.

10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.07.008
37

A.G. Mohamed, M.H. Ammar, and M. Nabawy, Risks assessment using structural equation modeling: mega housing projects construction in Risks assessment using structural equation modeling: mega housing projects construction in Egypt. Int. J. Constr. Manag. (2022), pp. 1-12.

38

S.Y. Kim, M. Van Nguyen, and T.T.N. Dao, Prioritizing complexity using fuzzy DANP: case study of international development projects. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 28(4) (2021), pp. 1114-1133.

10.1108/ECAM-04-2020-0265
39

A. Adamy and A.H.A. Bakar, Developing a building-performance evaluation framework for post-disaster reconstruction the case of hospital buildings in Aceh, Indonesia. Int. J. Constr. Manag. 21(1) (2021), pp. 56-77.

10.1080/15623599.2018.1506903
40

B. Dao, S. Kermanshachi, J. Shane, and S. Anderson, Developing a logistic regression model to measure project complexity. Archit. Eng. Des. Manag. 18(3) (2022), pp. 226-240.

10.1080/17452007.2020.1851166
41

Y. Wang, J. Li, G. Zhang, Y. Li, and M.H. Asare, Fuzzy evaluation of comprehensive benefit in urban renewal based on the perspective of core stakeholders. Habitat Int. 66 (2017), pp. 163-170.

10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.06.003
42

M.N. Gebremeskel, S.Y. Kim, L.D. Thuc, and M. Van Nguyen, Forming a driving index for implementing public-private partnership projects in emerging economy: Ethiopian perception. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 28(10) (2020), pp. 2925-2947.

10.1108/ECAM-06-2020-0459
43

M. Van Nguyen and K.D. Ha, A corporate social responsibility implementation index for architectural design firms in Vietnam. Archit. Eng. Des. Manag. (2023), pp. 1-14.

10.1080/17452007.2023.2166008
44

L.A. Vidal, F. Marle, and J.C. Bocquet, Measuring project complexity using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 29(6) (2011), pp. 718-727.

10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.07.005
45

Q. He, L. Luo, Y. Hu, and A.P.C.C. Chan, Measuring the complexity of mega construction projects in China-A fuzzy analytic network process analysis. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 33(3) (2015), pp. 549-563.

10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.07.009
46

Q.G. Shao, J.J.H. Liou, S.S. Weng, and Y.C. Chuang, Improving the green building evaluation system in China based on the DANP method. Sustain. 10(4) (2018), pp. 1-20.

10.3390/su10041173
47

F. Marle and L. Vidal, Managing Complex, High Risk Projects - A Guide to Basic and Advanced Project Management. 2016, London: Springer-V.

10.1007/978-1-4471-6787-7
48

B. Xia and A.P.C. Chan, Measuring complexity for building projects: A Delphi study. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 19(1) (2012), pp. 7-24.

10.1108/09699981211192544
49

D.D. Gransberg, J.S. Shane, K. Strong, and C.L. Del Puerto, Project complexity mapping in five dimensions for complex transportation projects. J. Manag. Eng. 29(4) (2013), pp. 316-326.

10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000163
50

S. Kermanshachi, B. Dao, B. Rouhanizadeh, J. Shane, and S. Anderson, Development of the Project Complexity Assessment and Management Framework for Heavy Industrial Projects. Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res. 16(1) (2020), pp. 24-42.

10.1080/15578771.2018.1499568
51

T. Vy, Ho Chi Minh City: Find the solution to the problem of renovating the old apartment, Resources and Environmental Magazine-Electronic version, 2022.

52

R.J. Chapman, A framework for examining the dimensions and characteristics of complexity inherent within rail megaprojects. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 34(6) (2016), pp. 937-956.

10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.05.001
53

M. Iván Tarride, The complexity of measuring complexity. Kybernetes. 42(2) (2013), pp. 174-184.

10.1108/03684921311310558
54

B. Dao, S. Kermanshachi, J. Shane, S. Anderson, and E. Hare, Exploring and Assessing Project Complexity. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 143(5) (2017).

10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001275
Information
  • Publisher :Sustainable Building Research Center (ERC) Innovative Durable Building and Infrastructure Research Center
  • Publisher(Ko) :건설구조물 내구성혁신 연구센터
  • Journal Title :International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development
  • Volume : 15
  • No :2
  • Pages :122-139
  • Received Date : 2023-11-07
  • Accepted Date : 2024-06-03
Journal Informaiton International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development
  • scopus
  • NRF
  • KOFST
  • KISTI Current Status
  • KISTI Cited-by
  • crosscheck
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
  • isc
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close