All Issue

2024 Vol.15, Issue 4

General Article

A Comprehensive review of analysis of geo-cell reinforced grit bed on footings
Gowthaman M1*
,
Sathyapriya S2
1Assistant Professor, Civil Engineering, Government College of Engineering - Dharmapuri, Chettikarai, Dharmapuri – 636 704, India
2Associate Professor, Civil Engineering, Government College of Engineering - Dharmapuri, Chettikarai, Dharmapuri – 636 704, India
*Corresponding Author
31 December 2024. pp. 465-483
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

In this review article, the reinforcement mechanisms, design aspects, numerical modeling methodologies of geo-cell reinforced soil and footing model behavior under various loading circumstances will be covered. Furthermore, this proposal outlines the numerous field application situations in which different types of geo-cells will be deployed, as well as the research challenges and future research opportunities in this sector. Experimentation and theoretical modeling from previous decades will be investigated in order to choose the appropriate geo-cell reinforced material arrangement that delivers the best performance when used with soil. Geo-cells will be installed at the foot of the culvert to balance the deprived act of the frail sub grades. This problem will be discussed through various studies that will include empirical and numerical methodologies. Geo-cells can also recover the footings near sloping areas and the stability of artificial slopes. Finally, the issues highlight research gaps, and discussion on future trends is critical for enhancing the overall technology of geo-cell reinforced soil.

Keywords
geo-cell
reinforcement
structures
sub grade
structural integrity
geo-synthetic
stability
References
1

H. Khalvati Fahliani, M.R. Arvin, N. Hataf, and A. Khademhosseini, Experimental model studies on strip footings resting on geocell-reinforced sand slopes. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering. 7(2) (2021), 24.

10.1007/s40891-021-00270-1
2

A. Biswas, Comparative performance of different geosynthetics on sandy soil overlying clay subgrades of varying strengths. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions. 4(1) (2019), 18.

10.1007/s41062-019-0204-5
3

R. Gedela and R. Karpurapu, Laboratory and numerical studies on the performance of geocell reinforced base layer overlying soft subgrade. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering. 7 (2021), pp. 1-18.

10.1007/s40891-020-00249-4
4

K. Halder and D. Chakraborty, Influence of soil spatial variability on the response of strip footing on geocell-reinforced slope. Computers and Geotechnics. 122 (2020), 103533.

10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103533
5

H. Khalvati Fahliani, M.R. Arvin, N. Hataf, and A. Khademhosseini, Experimental model studies on strip footings resting on geocell-reinforced sand slopes. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering. 7(2) (2021), 24.

10.1007/s40891-021-00270-1
6

M.R. Arvin, M. Heidari Sooreshjani, and A. Khademhosseini, Behaviour of geocell-reinforced strip footings on slopes. Geomechanics and Geoengineering. 17(4) (2022), pp. 1056-1072.

10.1080/17486025.2021.1912404
7

S. Muthukumar, A. Sakthivelu, K. Shanmugasundaram, N. Mahendran, and V. Ravichandran, Performance assessment of square footing on jute geocell-reinforced sand. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering. 5 (2019), pp. 1-10.

10.1007/s40891-019-0176-8
8

K. Yünkül, Ö.F. Usluoğulları, and A. Gürbüz, Numerical analysis of geocell reinforced square shallow horizontal plate anchor. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering. 39(4) (2021), pp. 3081-3099.

10.1007/s10706-021-01679-1
9

A. Hegde and H. Venkateswarlu, FLAC3D modeling of geocell reinforced foundation beds, Itasca International, 2020.

10.1007/978-981-15-6095-8_8
10

P. Fazeli Dehkordi and U.F.A. Karim, Behaviour of circular footings confined by rigid base and geocell reinforcement. Arabian Journal of Geosciences. 13 (2020), pp. 1-12.

10.1007/s12517-020-06092-1
11

S. Kumar, A.K. Sahu, and S. Naval, Performance of circular footing on expansive soil bed reinforced with geocells of Chevron pattern. Civil Engineering Journal. 5(11) (2019), pp. 2333-2348.

10.28991/cej-2019-03091415
12

A.M. Hegde, Cellular confinement systems: Characterization to field assessment. Geocells: Advances and Applications. (2020), pp. 29-61.

10.1007/978-981-15-6095-8_2
13

N. Khorsandiardebili and M. Ghazavi, Static stability analysis of geocell-reinforced slopes. Geotextiles and Geomembranes. 49(3) (2021), pp. 852-863.

10.1016/j.geotexmem.2020.12.012
14

V. Jayanthi, B. Soundara, S.M. Sanjaikumar, M.A. Siddharth, S.D. Shree, and S.P. Ragavi, Influencing Parameters on experimental and theoretical analysis of geocell reinforced soil. Materials Today: Proceedings. 66 (2022), pp. 1148-1155.

10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.951
15

S.P. Shrirao and S.S. Bhosale, Geocell Reinforced Soil/Subgrade: Comparative Study of Structural integrity Evaluation Methods. Journal of University of Shanghai for Science and Technology. 23(6) (2021), pp. 595-605.

10.51201/JUSST/21/05301
16

I.R. Sheikh and M.Y. Shah, Experimental study on geocell reinforced base over dredged soil using static plate load test. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology. 13 (2020), pp. 286-295.

10.1007/s42947-020-0238-2
17

A.M. Hegde and P.S. Palsule, Performance of geosynthetics reinforced subgrade subjected to repeated vehicle loads: experimental and numerical studies. Frontiers in Built Environment. 6 (2020), 15.

10.3389/fbuil.2020.00015
18

A.R. Menon and A. Bhasi, Time-dependent study of load transfer mechanism in geocell reinforced soil bed. Materials Today: Proceedings. (2023).

10.1016/j.matpr.2023.03.219
19

K. Fakharian and A. Pilban, Pullout tests on diagonally enhanced geocells embedded in sand to improve load-deformation response subjected to significant planar tensile loads. Geotextiles and Geomembranes. 49(5) (2021), pp. 1229-1244.

10.1016/j.geotexmem.2021.04.002
20

A.A. Ahamed, S. Muthukumar, and G. Santhoshkumar, Numerical Analysis Of Machine Foundations on BuiltupedGeosynthetic Reinforced Soil Bed. Mathematical Statistician and Engineering Applications. 71(3s) (2022), pp. 361-373.

21

I. Benessalah, M. Sadek, P. Villard, and A. Arab, Undrained triaxial compression tests on three-dimensional reinforced sand: effect of the geocell height. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering. 26(5) (2022), pp. 1694-1705.

10.1080/19648189.2020.1728581
22

S. Roy, Effects of Reinforcing Elements in Soil Reinforcement. International Journal of Geological and Geotechnical Engineering. 6(2) (2020), pp. 22-33.

23

V. Kumar and A. Kumar, Studying the behavior of neural models under hybrid and reinforced foundations. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 4 (2019), pp. 1-8.

10.1007/s41062-019-0208-1
24

D. Mahima and T. Sini, Flexural and rutting behaviour of subgrade reinforced with geocell and demolition waste as infill. In Transportation, Water and Environmental Geotechnics: Proceedings of Indian Geotechnical Conference 2020, 4 (2021), pp. 211-221. Springer Singapore.

10.1007/978-981-16-2260-1_20
25

M.R. Arvin, M. Abbasi, and H.K. Fahliani, Shear behavior of geocell-geofoam composite. Geotextiles and Geomembranes. 49(1) (2021), pp. 188-195.

10.1016/j.geotexmem.2020.09.012
26

B.P. Chandra, T. Kiyota, M. Harata, M. Shiga, and M. Chua, Hammock Effect Contribution to Bearing Capacity Improvement of Geocell Reinforced Soil. Institute of Industrial Science, University of Tokyo. pp. 1-12.

27

H. Venkateswarlu and A. Hegde, Factors influencing dynamic response of geocell reinforced soil beds. In Geo-Congress 2020, Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers. (2020), pp. 569-578.

10.1061/9780784482797.055
28

F. Changizi, A. Razmkhah, H. Ghasemzadeh, and M. Amelsakhi, Effect of oil-contamination on behavior of geocell-reinforced soil abutment wall. Journal of Petroleum Geomechanics. 4(1) (2021).

10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004132
29

M.R. Arvin, A. Zakeri, and M. BahmaniShoorijeh, Using finite element strength reduction method for stability analysis of geocell-reinforced slopes. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering. 37 (2019), pp. 1453-1467.

10.1007/s10706-018-0699-0
30

T. Kazemian and M.R. Arvin, Three-dimensional stability of locally loaded geocell-reinforced slopes by strength reduction method. Geomechanics and Geoengineering. 14(3) (2019), pp. 185-201.

10.1080/17486025.2019.1581275
31

Y. Zhao, Z. Lu, J. Liu, J. Zhang, and H. Yao, Influence of different builtup materials on the performance of geocell-reinforced cohesive soil beds. Scientific Reports. 13(1) (2023), 12330.

10.1038/s41598-023-39580-x37518268PMC10387485
32

N.M. Saleh, A.S. Hassan, A.G. Salama, and A.S. Hamoda, Performance of Soft Clay Stabilization Using Geocells Under Shallow Footings. Engineering Research Journal. (2019).

10.21608/erjsh.2020.405606
33

O.K. Ali and H.O. Abbas, Performance assessment of screw piles embedded in soft clay. Civil Engineering Journal. 5(8) (2019), pp. 1788-1798.

10.28991/cej-2019-03091371
34

S. Kolathayar, S. Narasimhan, R. Kamaludeen, and T.G. Sitharam, Performance of footing on clay bed reinforced with coir cell networks. International Journal of Geomechanics. 20(8) (2020), 04020106.

10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001719
35

S. Kolathayar, S. Sowmya, and E. Priyanka, Comparative study for performance of soil bed reinforced with jute and sisal geocells as alternatives to HDPE geocells. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering. 6(4) (2020), 53.

10.1007/s40891-020-00238-7
36

K.S. Akhil, N. Sankar, and S. Chandrakaran, Effect of aperture size on the performance of bamboo mat reinforced soil bed. Journal of Natural Fibers. 19(13) (2022), pp. 6909-6920.

10.1080/15440478.2021.1941480
37

M.A. Khan, N. Biswas, A. Banerjee, and A.J. Puppala, Performance of geocell-reinforced recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) bases in flexible pavements built on expansive soils. In Geo-Congress 2020, Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers. (2020), pp. 488-497.

10.1061/9780784482810.051
38

S. Nimbalkar, P. Punetha, and S. Kaewunruen, Performance improvement of ballasted railway tracks using geocells: present state of the art. In Geocells: Advances and Applications, Singapore: Springer Singapore. (2020), pp. 277-318.

10.1007/978-981-15-6095-8_11
39

M. Przybyłowicz, M. Sysyn, U. Gerber, V. Kovalchuk, and S. Fischer, Comparison of the effects and efficiency of vertical and side tamping methods for ballasted railway tracks. Construction and Building Materials. 314 (2022), 125708.

10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125708
40

P. Punetha, K. Maharjan, and S. Nimbalkar, Finite element modeling of the dynamic response of critical zones in a ballasted railway track. Frontiers in Built Environment. 7 (2021), 660292.

10.3389/fbuil.2021.660292
41

A.M. Krishna and A. Biswas, Performance of geosynthetic reinforced shallow foundations. Indian Geotechnical Journal. 51(3) (2021), pp. 583-597.

10.1007/s40098-021-00546-3
42

S. Abu El-Soud and A.M. Belal, Numerical modeling of rigid strip shallow foundations overlaying geosythetics-reinforced loose fine sand deposits. Arabian Journal of Geosciences. 12(7) (2019), 254.

10.1007/s12517-019-4436-7
43

M. Fattah and W.B. Mohammed Redha, Protection of flexible pipes from dynamic surface stresses by Geocell-reinforced sand backfill. International Journal of Mining and Geo-Engineering. 56(1) (2022), pp. 61-66.

44

N. Sivakumar, A. Mandal, S.R. Karumanchi, and D.K. Singh, Effect of fly ash layer addition on the bearing capacity of expansive soil. Emerging Materials Research. 9(4) (2020), pp. 1088-1102.

10.1680/jemmr.20.00034
45

S.N. Moghaddas Tafreshi, M. Rahimi, A.R Dawson, and B. Leshchinsky, Cyclic and post-cycling anchor response in geocell-reinforced sand. Canadian Geotechnical Journal. 56(11) (2019), pp. 1700-1718.

10.1139/cgj-2018-0559
46

B. Gao, X. Liu, J. Liu, L. Song, Y. Shi, and Y. Yang, Field characterization of dynamic response of geocell-reinforced aeolian sand subgrade under live traffic. Applied Sciences. 13(2) (2023), 864.

10.3390/app13020864
47

Y. Zhu, K. Tan, Y. Hong, T. Tan, M. Song, and Y. Wang, Deformation of the geocell flexible reinforced retaining wall under earthquake. Advances in Civil Engineering. 2021 (2021), pp. 1-11.

10.1155/2021/8897009
48

Z. Yang, Q. Zhang, W. Shi, J. Lv, Z. Lu, and X. Ling, Advances in properties of rubber reinforced soil. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2020 (2020), pp. 1-16.

10.1155/2020/6629757
49

R. Hore and M.A. Ansary, Cyclic Behavior Soft Clay Soil in Bangladesh. Progress Annals: Journal of Progressive Research. 1(4) (2023), pp. 12-20.

50

K. Vinay and M. Muthukumar, Performance of pervious pavement using geocell confinement under different drainage conditions: numerical investigation. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 16(2) (2023), pp. 413-424.

10.1007/s42947-021-00140-z
51

A.M. George, A. Banerjee, A.J. Puppala, and M. Saladhi, Performance evaluation of geocell-reinforced reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) bases in flexible pavements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering. 22(2) (2021), pp. 181-191.

10.1080/10298436.2019.1587437
52

P. FazeliDehkordi, Assessment Behavior of Cojointed Footings System Placed on Sands Encased by Geocell Reinforcement: Experimental Study. Amirkabir Journal of Civil Engineering. 54(3) (2022), pp. 1057-1076.

53

M.R. Arvin, M. Heidari Sooreshjani, and A. Khademhosseini, Behaviour of geocell-reinforced strip footings on slopes. Geomechanics and Geoengineering. 17(4) (2022), pp. 1056-1072.

10.1080/17486025.2021.1912404
54

J.A. Neto, Application of the two-layer system theory to calculate the settlements and vertical stress propagation in soil reinforcement with geocell. Geotextiles and Geomembranes. 47(1) (2019), pp. 32-41.

10.1016/j.geotexmem.2018.09.003
55

F. Changizi, A. Razmkhah, H. Ghasemzadeh, and M. Amelsakhi, Behavior of geocell-reinforced soil abutment wall: A physical modeling. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. 34(3) (2022), 04021495.

10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004132
56

P. Verma, P. Dhurvey, and V.P. Sundramurthy, Structural behaviour of metakaolingeopolymer concrete wall-type abutments with connected wing walls. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering. 2022 (2022).

10.1155/2022/6103595
57

H. Venkateswarlu, S. Sharma, and A. Hegde, Performance of genetic programming and multivariate adaptive regression spline models to predict vibration response of geocell reinforced soil bed: a comparative study. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering. 7(3) (2021), 63.

10.1007/s40891-021-00306-6
58

H. Venkateswarlu and A. Hegde, Effect of builtup materials on vibproportionn isolation efficacy of geocell-reinforced soil beds. Canadian Geotechnical Journal. 57(9) (2020), pp. 1304-1319.

10.1139/cgj-2019-0135
59

B. Gao, X. Liu, J. Liu, L. Song, Y. Shi, and Y. Yang, Field characterization of dynamic response of geocell-reinforced aeolian sand subgrade under live traffic. Applied Sciences. 13(2) (2023), 864.

10.3390/app13020864
60

S.K. Dash, R. Saikia, and S. Nimbalkar, Contact pressure distribution on subgrade soil underlying geocell reinforced foundation beds. Frontiers in Built Environment. 5 (2019), 137.

10.3389/fbuil.2019.00137
61

S. Kumar, A.K. Sahu, and S. Naval, Study on the swelling behavior of clayey soil blended with geocell and jute fibre. Civil Engineering Journal. 7(8) (2021), pp. 1327-1340.

10.28991/cej-2021-03091728
62

P. Fazeli Dehkordi, M. Ghazavi, and U.F. Karim, Bearing capacity-relative density behavior of circular footings resting on geocell-reinforced sand. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering. 26(11) (2022), pp. 5088-5112.

10.1080/19648189.2021.1884901
63

A. Krishna and G.M. Latha, Evolution of Geocells as Sustainable Support to Transportation Infrastructure. Sustainability. 15(15) (2023), 11773.

10.3390/su151511773
64

A. Deng and Z. Huangfu, Limit state and creep behaviour of high-density polyethylene geocell. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering. 7(2) (2021), 28.

10.1007/s40891-021-00269-8
65

Y. Zhao, Z. Lu, J. Liu, J. Zhang, and H. Yao, Influence of different builtup materials on the performance of geocell-reinforced cohesive soil beds. Scientific Reports. 13(1) (2023), 12330.

10.1038/s41598-023-39580-x37518268PMC10387485
66

Q. Bai, G. He, Y. Wang, and J. Liu, Experimental investigation on mechanical properties of geocell strips at low temperature. Materials. 15(15) (2022), 5456.

10.3390/ma1515545635955390PMC9369987
67

S.J. Birajdar, J.G. Iraganti, P.A. Mungapatil, S.V. Jamadar, P.U. Gajul, and R.S. Kshirsagar, Soil stabilization by using geocell. Int. J. Adv. Eng. Manag.(IJAEM) Jul. 3(7) (2021), 2031-6.

68

G.T. Mehrjardi, R. Behrad, and S.M. Tafreshi, Scale effect on the behavior of geocell-reinforced soil. Geotextiles and Geomembranes. 47(2) (2019), pp. 154-163.

10.1016/j.geotexmem.2018.12.003
69

H. Venkateswarlu and A. Hegde, Effect of influencing parameters on the vibration isolation efficacy of geocell reinforced soil beds. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering. 6 (2020), pp. 1-17.

10.1007/s40891-020-00205-2
70

A.K. Choudhary, B. Pandit, and G.S. Babu, Uplift capacity of horizontal anchor plate in geocell reinforced sand. Geotextiles and Geomembranes. 47(2) (2019), pp. 203-216.

10.1016/j.geotexmem.2018.12.009
71

M. Alali, B. Paikaray, and B.G. Mohapatra, Behavioral investigation of the footings on geosynthetics-reinforced ferrochrome slag. International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development. 13(4) (2022), pp. 436-453.

72

B. Chandrakar, M.K. Gupta, and S. Jaiswal, Distribution of shear lag and its significance in tensile capacity of steel angle section. International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development. 14(3) (2023), pp. 405-417.

73

B. Chandrakar, M.K. Gupta, and S. Jaiswal, Study of block shear failure on steel angle tension members through finite element modelling. International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development. 14(3) (2023), pp. 389-404.

74

D.K. Srivastava, A. Srivastava, A.K. Misra, and V. Sahu, Forensic assessment of a fail head wall of Hume Pipe Culvert: Focus on Geotechnical prospective. International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development. 9(3) (2018), pp. 96-109.

Information
  • Publisher :Sustainable Building Research Center (ERC) Innovative Durable Building and Infrastructure Research Center
  • Publisher(Ko) :건설구조물 내구성혁신 연구센터
  • Journal Title :International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development
  • Volume : 15
  • No :4
  • Pages :465-483
  • Received Date : 2024-09-03
  • Accepted Date : 2024-12-07
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.22712/susb.20240033
Journal Informaiton International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development
Online Submission
  • scopus
  • NRF
  • KOFST
  • KISTI Current Status
  • KISTI Cited-by
  • crosscheck
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
  • isc
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close