All Issue

2026 Vol.17, Issue 2 Preview Page

General Article

Agentic AI for sustainable development: Trust protocol for carbon emissions decomposition and retrospective analysis
Timur Dosmambetov1*
,
Yonghan Ahn2
1Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Applied Artificial Intelligence, Hanyang University ERICA, Ansan, South Korea
2Professor, Department of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University ERICA, Ansan, South Korea
*Corresponding Author
30 June 2026. pp. 214-252
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) can generate coherent narratives about quantitative results, but their probabilistic nature creates a critical reliability gap for retrospective auditing tasks, where error tolerance is effectively zero. The dissertation fills this gap through the introduction of a Trust Protocol for agentic architecture framework using multi-agent systems. It depends on the implementation of separation of concerns design, which combines gated workflow with identity-constrained methods for qualitative and quantitative reporting. The protocol uses a gated workflow that starts with input validation to enforce a strict data schema, then runs deterministic LMDI calculations as the identity constraint, and finally applies anchoring and validation so the report can only use values that appear in the verified output artifacts. The system is evaluated using a hybrid point of comparison that falls between single agent, tool-assisted reporting and an overall multi-agent workflow. Measures used in the evaluation include identity closure consistency, hallucination failure flags such as numerical mismatch, unanchored interpretation, contextual claims without citations, and causal overreach, as well as workflow completion reliability and runtime cost profile, which are measured by token use, tool call success rates, and execution latency. The validation testbed is a Kyrgyzstan manufacturing-sector dataset (2012-2023) due to its accounting identity that makes it amenable to unit-test type verification of report correctness. Findings indicate that the proposed architecture can maintain numerical accuracy with deterministic ground truth and minimize unanchored interpretive failures compared to the hybrid baseline which allows supporting the argument that protocol-level constraints and not instruction-following alone are necessary to achieve audit-grade AI assistance.

Keywords
LMDI decomposition
agentic AI
trust protocol
large language models
emissions accounting
climate policy
Kyrgyzstan
digital transformation
References
1

G. Qu, Y. Shi, Y. Yang, W. Wu, and Z. Zhou, Methods, Progress and Challenges in Global Monitoring of Carbon Emissions from Biomass Combustion. Atmosphere. (2024).

10.3390/atmos15101247
2

T. Hilorme, L.M. Karpenko, V.O. Fedoruk, I.Y. Shevchenko, and S. Drobyazko, Innovative methods of performance evaluation of energy efficiency projects. Academy of Strategic Management Journal. 17(2) (2018), pp. 1-11.

3

V. Bolón-Canedo, L. Morán-Fernández, B. Cancela, and A. Alonso-Betanzos, A review of green artificial intelligence: Towards a more sustainable future. Neurocomputing. 599 (2024), 128096.

4

X. Xiang, X. Ma, Z. Ma, M. Ma, and W. Cai, Python-LMDI: A tool for index decomposition analysis of building carbon emissions. Buildings. 12(1) (2022), 83.

10.3390/buildings12010083
5

Z. Ji, N. Lee, R. Frieske, T. Yu, D. Su, Y. Xu, E. Ishii, Y. Bang, D. Chen, W. Dai, H.S. Chan, A. Madotto, and P. Fung, Survey of hallucination in natural language generation. ACM Computing Surveys. 55(12) (2023), pp. 1-38.

10.1145/3571730
6

Y. Zhang, Y. Li, L. Cui, D. Cai, L. Liu, T. Fu, X. Huang, E. Zhao, Y. Zhang, C. Xu, Y. Chen, F. Shi, and S. Shi, Siren’s Song in the AI Ocean: A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models. Computational Linguistics. (2025), pp. 1-46.

10.1162/COLI.a.16
7

S.A.R. Khan, D.I. Godil, C.J.C. Jabbour, S. Shujaat, and A. Razzaq, Green data analytics, blockchain technology for sustainable development, and sustainable supply chain practices: evidence from small and medium enterprises. Annals of Operations Research. (2021).

10.1007/s10479-021-04275-x
8

S. Majumder, L. Dong, F. Doudi, Y. Cai, C. Tian, D. Kalathil, K. Ding, A.A. Thatte, N. Li, and L. Xie, Exploring the capabilities and limitations of large language models in the electric energy sector. Joule. 8(6) (2024), pp. 1544-1549.

9

K.W. Church, J. Sun, R. Yue, P. Vickers, W. Saba, and R. Chandrasekar, Emerging trends: a gentle introduction to RAG. Natural Language Engineering. 30(4) (2024), pp. 870-881.

10.1017/S1351324924000044
10

J.Y. Yao, K.P. Ning, Z.H. Liu, M.N. Ning, Y.Y. Liu, and L. Yuan, Llm lies: Hallucinations are not bugs, but features as adversarial examples. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.01469. (2023).

11

S.M. Islam, N. Borenstein, S.M. Pawar, H. Yu, A. Arora, and I. Augenstein, BiasGym: Fantastic LLM Biases and How to Find (and Remove) Them. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.08855. (2025).

12

D. Hendrycks, C. Burns, S. Basart, A. Zou, M. Mazeika, D. Song, and J. Steinhardt, Measuring massive multitask language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.03300. (2020).

13

Z. Shao, P. Wang, Q. Zhu, R. Xu, J. Song, X. Bi, H. Zhang, M. Zhang, Y.K. Li, Y. Wu, and D. Guo, Deepseekmath: Pushing the limits of mathematical reasoning in open language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03300. (2024).

14

D. Guo, D. Yang, H. Zhang, J. Song, P. Wang, and Q. Zhu, Deepseek-r1: Incentivizing reasoning capability in llms via reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.12948. (2025).

15

C. Zhao, M. Zhang, J. Bai, J. Wu, and I.S. Chang, A review of the application of machine learning in carbon emission assessment studies: prediction optimization and driving factor selection. Science of The Total Environment. 987 (2025), 179678.

10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179678
16

M.K. Heun, LMDIR. MatthewHeun/LMDIR [Online]. 2019. Available at: https://github.com/MatthewHeun/LMDIR/ [Accessed 8/2024].

17

M. Zekić-Sušac, S. Mitrović, and A. Has, Machine learning based system for managing energy efficiency of public sector as an approach towards smart cities. International Journal of Information Management. 58 (2021), 102074.

10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102074
18

J. Wu, S. Yang, R. Zhan, Y. Yuan, L.S. Chao, and D.F. Wong, A survey on llm-generated text detection: Necessity, methods, and future directions. Computational Linguistics. 51(1) (2025), pp. 275-338.

10.1162/coli_a_00549
19

A. Ioste, Hallucinations or Attention Misdirection? The Path to Strategic Value Extraction in Business Using Large Language Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.14002. (2024).

20

S.M.T.I. Tonmoy, S.M.M. Zaman, V. Jain, A. Rani, V. Rawte, A. Chadha, and A. Das, A comprehensive survey of hallucination mitigation techniques in large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.01313. (2024), 6.

21

C. Rebuffel, M. Roberti, L. Soulier, G. Scoutheeten, and P. Gallinari, Controlling hallucinations at word level in data-to-text generation. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. (2022), pp. 1-37.

10.1007/s10618-021-00801-4
22

G. Sriramanan, S. Bharti, V.S. Sadasivan, S. Saha, P. Kattakinda, and S. Feizi, Llm-check: Investigating detection of hallucinations in large language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 37 (2024), pp. 34188-34216.

10.52202/079017-1077
23

L. Jiang, K. Jiang, X. Chu, S. Gulati, and P. Garg, Hallucination detection in LLM-enriched product listings. in Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on e-Commerce and NLP@ LREC-COLING 2024. (2024).

10.63317/4r7nnjatdqim
24

M. Sato, Triggering Hallucinations in LLMs: A Quantitative Study of Prompt-Induced Hallucination in Large Language Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.00557. (2025).

25

P. Lewis, E. Perez, A. Piktus, F. Petroni, V. Karpukhin, N. Goyal, H. Küttler, M. Lewis, W.T. Yih, T. Rocktäschel, S. Riedel, and D. Kiela, Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive nlp tasks. Advances in neural information processing systems. 33 (2020), pp. 9459-9474.

26

J. Maynez, S. Narayan, B. Bohnet, and R. McDonald, On faithfulness and factuality in abstractive summarization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.00661. (2020).

10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.173
27

AWS. What is RAG? - Retrieval-Augmented Generation AI Explained [Online]. 2024. Available at: https://aws.amazon.com/what-is/retrieval-augmented-generation/ [Accessed 12/10/2024].

28

P. Manakul, A. Liusie, and M. Gales. Selfcheckgpt: Zero-resource black-box hallucination detection for generative large language models. in Proceedings of the 2023 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing. (2023).

10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.557
29

X. Li, S. Wang, S. Zeng, Y. Wu, and Y. Yang, A survey on LLM-based multi-agent systems: workflow, infrastructure, and challenges. Vicinagearth. 1(1) (2024), 9.

10.1007/s44336-024-00009-2
30

Y. Li, H. Wang, and Z. Zhang, Multi-agent based Workflow Management Systems Design. Advanced Science Letters. 6(1) (2012), pp. 727-731.

10.1166/asl.2012.2227
31

P.H. Luzolo, Z. Elrawashdeh, I. Tchappi, S. Galland, and F. Outay, Combining Multi-Agent Systems and Artificial Intelligence of Things: Technical challenges and gains. Internet of Things. 28 (2024), 101364.

10.1016/j.iot.2024.101364
32

M. Wooldridge, An introduction to multiagent systems. 2009, John wiley & sons.

33

Y.K. Labrou and T. Finin, A Proposal for a new KQML Specification. TR CS-97-03, 1997.

34

Y. Niu, R.R. Paleja, and M.C. Gombolay, Multi-Agent Graph-Attention Communication and Teaming. in AAMAS. 2021.

10.65109/YHUO7761
35

N.R. Jennings, K. Sycara, and M. Wooldridge, A roadmap of agent research and development. Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems. 1 (1998), pp. 7-38.

10.1023/A:1010090405266
36

E. Adamopoulou and L. Moussiades, Chatbots: History, technology, and applications. Machine Learning with applications. 2 (2020), 100006.

10.1016/j.mlwa.2020.100006
37

T. Coshow, Intelligent agents in AI are nascent but quickly maturing, in Intelligent Agents in AI Really Can Work Alone. Here’s How. 2024, October, Gartner.

38

D.B. Acharya, K. Kuppan, and B. Divya, Agentic AI: Autonomous Intelligence for Complex Goals–A Comprehensive Survey. IEEE Access. (2025).

10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3532853
39

A. Bandi, B. Kongari, R. Naguru, S. Pasnoor, and S.V. Vilipala, The rise of agentic ai: A review of definitions, frameworks, architectures, applications, evaluation metrics, and challenges. Future Internet. 17(9) (2025), 404.

40

L. Chen, Z. Peng, Y. Yang, Y. Wang, W.T. Tang, H.H. Kobayashi, and W. Zhang, EnvX: Agentize Everything with Agentic AI. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.08088, (2025).

41

K.T. Tran, D. Dao, M.D. Nguyen, Q.V. Pham, B. O'Sullivan, and H.D. Nguyen, Multi-agent collaboration mechanisms: A survey of llms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.06322, (2025).

42

A.J. Goodell, S.N. Chu, D. Rouholiman, and L.F. Chu, Large language model agents can use tools to perform clinical calculations. NPJ Digital Medicine, 8(1) (2025), 163.

10.1038/s41746-025-01475-840097720PMC11914283
43

E. Lumer, F. Nizar, A. Gulati, P.H. Basavaraju, and V.K. Subbiah, Tool-to-agent retrieval: Bridging tools and agents for scalable llm multi-agent systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.01854, (2025).

44

A. Duzha, E. Alexakis, D. Kyriazis, L.F. Sahi, and M.A. Kandi, From Data Governance by design to Data Governance as a Service: A transformative human-centric data governance framework. in Proceedings of the 2023 7th International Conference on Cloud and Big Data Computing. (2023).

10.1145/3616131.3616145
45

L. Wang, Z. You, Q. Zhang, J. Wen, J. Shi, Y. Chen, Y. Wang, F. Ding, Z. Feng, and L. Lu, REACT-LLM: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Integration with Causal Features in Clinical Prognostic Tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.07127. (2025).

46

R. Aksitov, S. Miryoosefi, Z. Li, D. Li, S. Babayan, K. Kopparapu, Z. Fisher, R. Guo, S. Prakash, P. Srinivasan, M. Zaheer, F. Yu, and S. Kumar, Rest meets react: Self-improvement for multi-step reasoning llm agent. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.10003. (2023).

47

J. Wu, J. Zhu, and Y. Liu, Agentic Reasoning: Reasoning LLMs with Tools for the Deep Research. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.04644, (2025).

48

S. Maksyutov, S. Eggleston, J.H. Woo, S. Fang, J. Witi, M. Gillenwater, J. Goodwin, F. Tubiello, A. Manning, S. Ogle, C. Randles, and M. Maione, 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Vol 1 Chapter 6: Quality Assurance/Quality Control And VeRification. (2019).

49

A. Cowie, R. Eckard, and S. Eady, Greenhouse gas accounting for inventory, emissions trading and life cycle assessment in the land-based sector: a review. Crop and Pasture Science. 63(3) (2012), pp. 284-296.

10.1071/CP11188
50

H.S. Eggleston, L. Buendia, K. Miwa, T. Ngara, and K. Tanabe, 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, 2006.

51

W.M. Budzianowski, Target for national carbon intensity of energy by 2050: A case study of Poland’s energy system. Energy. 46(1) (2012), pp. 575-581.

10.1016/j.energy.2012.07.051
52

H. Gao, X. Wang, K. Wu, Y. Zheng, Q. Wang, W. Shi, and M. He, A Review of Building Carbon Emission Accounting and Prediction Models. Buildings. 13(7) (2023), 1617.

10.3390/buildings13071617
53

Y. Li, H. Chen, P. Yu, and L. Yang, The Application and Evaluation of the LMDI Method in Building Carbon Emissions Analysis: A Comprehensive Review. Buildings. 14(9) (2024), 2820.

10.3390/buildings14092820
54

P. Sharma, Role of energy efficiency in energy transition: A decomposition analysis of energy use. Solar Compass. 12 (2024), 100086.

10.1016/j.solcom.2024.100086
55

P. Yang, C. Cui, L. Li, W. Chen, Y. Shi, Z. Mi, and D. Guan, Carbon emissions in countries that failed to ratify the intended nationally determined contributions: a case study of Kyrgyzstan. Journal of Environmental Management. 255 (2020), 109892.

10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109892
56

V. Franco, M. Kousoulidou, M. Muntean, L. Ntziachristos, S. Hausberger, and P. Dilara, Road vehicle emission factors development: A review. Atmospheric Environment. 70 (2013), pp. 84-97.

10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.01.006
57

N. Kalthoff, U. Corsmeier, K. Schmidt, C. Kottmeier, F. Fiedler, M. Habram, and F. Slemr, Emissions of the city of Augsburg determined using the mass balance method. Atmospheric Environment. 36 (2002), pp. 19-31.

10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00215-7
58

X. Cai, B. Cai, H. Zhang, L. Chen, C. Zheng, P. Tong, H. Lin, Q. Zhang, M. Liu, Y. Tong, and X. Wang, Establishment of high-resolution atmospheric mercury emission inventories for Chinese cement plants based on the mass balance method. Environmental Science & Technology. 54(21) (2020), pp. 13399-13408.

10.1021/acs.est.0c02963
59

A. Christen, Atmospheric measurement techniques to quantify greenhouse gas emissions from cities. Urban Climate. 10 (2014), pp. 241-260.

10.1016/j.uclim.2014.04.006
60

I. Ozturk, M.T. Majeed, and S. Khan, Decoupling and decomposition analysis of environmental impact from economic growth: a comparative analysis of Pakistan, India, and China. Environmental and Ecological Statistics. (2021), pp. 1-28.

10.1007/s10651-021-00495-3
61

B.W. Ang and F.L. Liu, A new energy decomposition method: perfect in decomposition and consistent in aggregation. Energy. 26(6) (2001), pp. 537-548.

10.1016/S0360-5442(01)00022-6
62

B.W. Ang, The LMDI approach to decomposition analysis: a practical guide. Energy policy. 33(7) (2005), pp. 867-871.

63

C. Agarwal, S.H. Tanneru, and H. Lakkaraju, Faithfulness vs. plausibility: On the (un) reliability of explanations from large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.04614. (2024).

64

K. Belhajjame, J. Cheney, D. Corsar, D. Garijo, S. Soiland-Reyes, S. Zednik, P. Groth, T. Zhao, D. Turi, and P. Missier, Prov-dm: The prov data model. W3C Recommendation. 14 (2013), pp. 15-16.

65

T. Huang, S. Hu, F. Ilhan, S. F. Tekin, Z. Yahn, Y. Xu, and L. Liu, Safety tax: Safety alignment makes your large reasoning models less reasonable. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.00555, (2025).

66

R.D. Peng, Reproducible research in computational science. Science. 334(6060) (2011), pp. 1226-1227.

10.1126/science.1213443
67

D. Banerjee, A. Singh, R. Kumar, and S. Patel, CRANE: Reasoning with constrained LLM generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.09061. (2025).

68

L. Beurer-Kellner, M. Fischer, and M. Vechev, Guiding llms the right way: Fast, non-invasive constrained generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.06988, (2024).

69

S. Alrubei, E. Ball, and J. Rigelsford, HDPoA: Honesty-based distributed proof of authority via scalable work consensus protocol for IoT-blockchain applications. Computer Networks. 217 (2022), 109337.

10.1016/j.comnet.2022.109337
70

J. Cheng, T. Su, J. Yuan, G. He, J. Liu, X. Tao, J. Xie, and H. Li, Chain-of-Thought Prompting Obscures Hallucination Cues in Large Language Models: An Empirical Evaluation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.17088, (2025).

10.18653/v1/2025.findings-emnlp.67
71

R. Merritt, What Is Retrieval-Augmented Generation aka RAG? [Online]. 2024. Available at: https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/what-is-retrieval-augmented-generation/ [Accessed 3/10/2024].

72

C. Zhang and H. Luo, Research on carbon emission peak prediction and path of China’s public buildings: Scenario analysis based on LEAP model. Energy and Buildings. 289 (2023), 113053.

73

Y. Jin and A. Sharifi, Machine learning for predicting urban greenhouse gas emissions: A systematic literature review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 215 (2025), 115625.

10.1016/j.rser.2025.115625
74

Y. Tian, X. Ren, K. Li, and X. Li, Carbon Dioxide Emission Forecast: A Review of Existing Models and Future Challenges. Sustainability. 17(4) (2025), 1471.

10.3390/su17041471
75

L. Huang, W. Yu, W. Ma, W. Zhong, Z. Feng, H. Wang, Q. Chen, W. Peng, X. Feng, B. Qin, and T. Liu, A survey on hallucination in large language models: Principles, taxonomy, challenges, and open questions. ACM Transactions on Information Systems. 43(2) (2025), pp. 1-55.

76

K. Shuster, S. Poff, M. Chen, D. Kiela, and J. Weston, Retrieval augmentation reduces hallucination in conversation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.07567, (2021).

10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.320
77

A. Mohammed Salah, A. Alnoor, F. Abdelfattah, and X.Y. Chew, Agentic Ai Forging Adaptive, Equity-Driven Governance Pathways for Sustainable Futures. XinYing, Agentic Ai Forging Adaptive, Equity-Driven Governance Pathways for Sustainable Futures, (2024).

10.2139/ssrn.5229744
78

K. Ahmed, K.-W. Chang, and G.V.D. Broeck, Controllable generation via locally constrained resampling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.13111, (2024).

79

X. Lin, Z. Zhang, P. Yue, H. Li, J. Zhang, B. Fan, H. Su, and X. Gong, SyncIntellects: Orchestrating LLM Inference with Progressive Prediction and QoS-Friendly Control. in 2024 IEEE/ACM 32nd International Symposium on Quality of Service (IWQoS). IEEE. (2024).

80

K. Zhu, Z. Liu, B. Li, M. Tian, Y. Yang, and J. Zhang, Where llm agents fail and how they can learn from failures. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.25370, (2025).

81

S. Lin, J. Hilton, and O. Evans, Truthfulqa: Measuring how models mimic human falsehoods. in Proceedings of the 60th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics (volume 1: long papers). (2022).

10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.229
82

L. Zhou, W. Schellaert, F. Martínez-Plumed, Y. Moros-Daval and J. Hernández-Orallo, Larger and more instructable language models become less reliable. Nature. 634(8032) (2024), pp. 61-68.

10.1038/s41586-024-07930-y39322679PMC11446866
83

S. Yao, J. Zhao, D. Yu, N. Du, I. Shafran, K. Narasimhan, and Y. Cao, React: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models. in The eleventh international conference on learning representations. (2022).

84

B.W. Ang and N. Liu, Handling zero values in the logarithmic mean Divisia index decomposition approach. Energy policy. 35(1) (2007), pp. 238-246.

10.1016/j.enpol.2005.11.001
85

E. Tabassi, Artificial intelligence risk management framework (AI RMF 1.0), 2023.

10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1
86

L. Moreau, P. Missier, J. Cheney, and S. Soiland-Reyes, PROV-N: The provenance notation, 2013.

87

B.W. Ang, LMDI decomposition approach: A guide for implementation. Energy Policy. 86 (2015), pp. 233-238.

10.1016/j.enpol.2015.07.007
88

J. Chontanawat, P. Wiboonchutikula, and A. Buddhivanich, An LMDI decomposition analysis of carbon emissions in the Thai manufacturing sector. Energy Reports. 6 (2020), pp. 705-710.

10.1016/j.egyr.2019.09.053
89

L. Ma, C. Chong, X. Zhang, P. Liu, W. Li, and W. Ni, LMDI Decomposition of Energy-Related CO2 Emissions Based on Energy and CO2 Allocation Sankey Diagrams: The Method and an Application to China. Sustainability. 10(2) (2018), 344.

10.3390/su10020344
90

IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), Emission factor database. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2006.

10.1017/CBO9780511546013
91

IRENA (International Renewable Energy Agency), Renewables Readiness Assessment: The Kyrgyz Republic, Cabinet of Ministers of Kyrgyz, in Executive Summary, I.R.E. Agency, Editor. International Renewable Energy Agency: Abu Dhabi, 2022.

92

C.-Y. Lin, ROUGE: A Package for Automatic Evaluation of Summaries. Barcelona, Spain: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2004.

93

Z. Duan and J. Wang, Exploration of LLM Multi- Agent Application Implementation Based on LangGraph+ CrewAI. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.18241, (2024).

10.32388/R27SW4
94

Government of Kyrgyz Republic, Decree No:601 on Approval of the Government Program on Energy Saving and Energy Efficiency Policy Planning for 2015-2017. Ministry of Justice of Kyrgyz Republic, 2015.

95

R. Landman, S.P. Healey, V. Loprinzo, U. Kochendoerfer, A.R. Winnier, P.V. Henstock, W. Lin, and A. Cao, Using large language models for safety-related table summarization in clinical study reports. JAMIA Open. 7(2) (2024).

96

K.O. Dzushupov, J.M.A. Buban, A.A. Aidaraliev, A. Ahmadi, P. Chahal, M. Ibrahim, X. Lin, and M.B.N. Kouwenhoven, Air pollution in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan: Driving factors and state response. Public Health Challenges. 1(4) (2022), e22.

97

E. Isaev, B. Ajikeev, U. Shamyrkanov, K. Kalnur, K. Maisalbek, and R.C. Sidle, Impact of climate change and air pollution forecasting using machine learning techniques in Bishkek. Aerosol and Air Quality Research. 22(3) (2022), 210336.

10.4209/aaqr.210336
98

P. Christoff, Ecological modernisation, ecological modernities. Environmental politics. 5(3) (1996), pp. 476-500.

10.1080/09644019608414283
99

M.E. Mastrangelo and S. Aguiar, Are Ecological Modernization Narratives Useful for Understanding and Steering Social-Ecological Change in the Argentine Chaco? Sustainability. 11(13) (2019), 3593.

10.3390/su11133593
100

S. Min, K. Krishna, X. Lyu, M. Lewis, W. Yih, P. Koh, M. Iyyer, L. Zettlemoyer, and H. Hajishirz, Factscore: Fine-grained atomic evaluation of factual precision in long form text generation. in Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. (2023).

10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.741
101

L. Wang, C. Ma, X. Feng, Z. Zhang, H. Yang, J. Zhang, Z. Chen, J. Tang, X. Chen, Y. Lin, W.X. Zhao, Z. Wei, and J. Wen, A survey on large language model based autonomous agents. Frontiers of Computer Science. 18(6) (2024), 186345.

10.1007/s11704-024-40231-1
102

R. Glatt, D. Sandalow, C. McCormick, A. Kucukelbir, and J. Friedmann, Artificial Intelligence for Climate Change Mitigation Roadmap. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States), 2024.

103

O. Ovadia, M. Brief, M. Mishaeli, and O. Elisha, Fine-tuning or retrieval? comparing knowledge injection in llms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.05934. (2023).

10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.15
104

T. Schick, J. Dwivedi-Yu, R. Dessì, R. Raileanu, M. Lomeli, and L. Zettlemoyer, Toolformer: Language models can teach themselves to use tools. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 36 (2023), pp. 68539-68551.

10.52202/075280-2997
Information
  • Publisher :Sustainable Building Research Center (ERC) Innovative Durable Building and Infrastructure Research Center
  • Publisher(Ko) :건설구조물 내구성혁신 연구센터
  • Journal Title :International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development
  • Volume : 17
  • No :2
  • Pages :214-252
  • Received Date : 2026-02-20
  • Accepted Date : 2026-03-03
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.22712/susb.20260014
Journal Informaiton International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development
Online Submission
  • scopus
  • NRF
  • KOFST
  • KISTI Current Status
  • KISTI Cited-by
  • crosscheck
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
  • isc
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close