International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development ISSN:2093-761X(Print) 2093-7628(Online)

IBM. What is a chatbot? [Online], 2021. Available at: https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/chatbots#:~:text=AI%20chatbots%20are%20chatbots%20that,flowing%20way%20without%20being%20misunderstood1 [Accessed 26/04/2025].

T. Chen, M. Gascó-Hernandez, and M. Esteve, The Adoption and Implementation of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in Public Organizations: Evidence from U.S. State Governments. The American Review of Public Administration. 54(3) (2023), 255-270.

C. Chiancone, Understanding the Role of AI in Government Decision Making. in linkedin.com. 2023.

E. Papagiannidis, P. Mikalef, and K. Conboy, Responsible artificial intelligence governance: A review and research framework. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems. 34(2) (2025), 101885.

A.S. Rathnayake, T.D.H.N. Nguyen, and Y. Ahn, Factors Influencing AI Chatbot Adoption in Government Administration: A Case Study of Sri Lanka's Digital Government. Administrative Sciences. 15(5) (2025), 157.

D. Hillemann, Navigating the Challenges of Implementing Artificial Intelligence in the Public Sector: An In-Depth Analysis [Online], 2023. Available at: https://dhillemann.medium.com/navigating-the-challenges-of-implementing-artificial-intelligence-in-the-public-sector-an-in-depth-cb714fe6616b [Accessed 15/01/2025].

P. Mikalef, K. Lemmer, C. Schaefer, M. Ylinen, S.O. Fjørtoft, H.Y. Torvatn, M. Gupta, and B. Niehaves, Examining how AI capabilities can foster organizational performance in public organizations. Government Information Quarterly. 40(2) (2023).

R. Medaglia and L. Tangi. The adoption of Artificial Intelligence in the public sector in Europe: drivers, features, and impacts. in ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. (2022).

T. Chen, M. Gascó-Hernandez, and M. Esteve, The Adoption and Implementation of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in Public Organizations: Evidence from U.S. State Governments. Sage Journals. 54(3) (2024), pp. 255-270.

T. Yigitcanlar, A. David, W. Li, C. Fookes, S.E. Bibri, X. Ye, Unlocking Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Local Governments: Best Practice Lessons from Real-World Implementations. Smart Cities. (2024), pp. 1576-1625.

A.G. Larsen and A. Følstad, The impact of chatbots on public service provision: A qualitative interview study with citizens and public service providers. Government Information Quarterly. 41(2) (2024), 101927.

F.D. Davis, Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly. 13(3) (1989), pp. 319-340.

Ministry of Technology, G.o.S.L., DIGITAL SRI LANKA 2030, G.o.S.L. Ministry of Technology, Editor. 2024. p. 49.

N. Saif, S.U. Khan, I. Shaheen, F.A. ALotaibi, M.M. Alnfiai, and M. Arif, Chat-GPT; validating Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in education sector via ubiquitous learning mechanism. Computers in Human Behavior. 154 (2024), 108097.

W. Alenazy, W. Al-Rahmi, and M.S. Khan, Validation of TAM Model on Social Media Use for Collaborative Learning to Enhance Collaborative Authoring. IEEE Access. (2019). pp. 1-1.

H. Ranaweera, Perspective of trust towards e-government initiatives in Sri Lanka. SpringerPlus. 5 (2016), pp. 1-11.

M. Knight-John, S. Jayasinghe, and A. Perumal, Regulatory impact assessment in Sri Lanka: the bridges that have to be crossed. AgEcon Search, (2004), ageconsearch.umn.edu.

F.D. Davis, Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly. 13(3) (1989), pp. 319-340.

F.D. Davis and V. Venkatesh, A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: three experiments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 45(1) (1996), pp. 19-45.

R.B. Ikhsan, Y. Fernando, H. Prabowo, A. Gui, and E.A. Kuncoro, An empirical study on the use of artificial intelligence in the banking sector of Indonesia by extending the TAM model and the moderating effect of perceived trust. Digital Business. 5(1) (2025), 100103.

O.C. Edo, D. Ang, E.E. Etu, I. Tenebe, S. Edo, and O.A. Diekola, Why do healthcare workers adopt digital health technologies - A cross- sectional study integrating the TAM and UTAUT model in a developing economy. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights. 3(2) (2023), 100186.

S.R. Natasia, Y.T. Wiranti, and A. Parastika, Acceptance analysis of NUADU as e-learning platform using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) approach. Procedia Computer Science. 197 (2022), pp. 512-520.

Y. Malhotra and D.F. Galletta. Extending the technology acceptance model to account for social influence: theoretical bases and empirical validation. in Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers. (1999).

F. Davis, R. Bagozzi, and P. Warshaw, User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science. 35 (1989), pp. 982-1003.

M. Ilyas, A. ud din, M. Haleem, and I. Ahmad, Digital entrepreneurial acceptance: an examination of technology acceptance model and do-it-yourself behavior. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship. 12(1) (2023), 15.

P.R. Warshaw and F.D. Davis, Disentangling behavioral intention and behavioral expectation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 21 (1985), pp. 213-228.

I. Ajzen and M. Fishbein, The prediction of behavior from attitudinal and normative variables. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 6 (1970), pp. 466-487.

R. Gorsuch and J. Ortberg, Moral obligation and attitudes: Their relation to behavioral intentions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 44 (1983), pp. 1025-1028.

D. Landis, H. Triandis, and J. Adamopoulos, Habit and Behavioral Intentions as Predictors of Social Behavior. Journal of Social Psychology - J SOC PSYCHOL. 106 (1978), pp. 227-237.

R. Bagozzi, Attitudes, Intentions, and Behavior: A Test of Some Key Hypotheses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 41(4) (1981), pp. 607-627.

P.R. Warshaw, A New Model for Predicting Behavioral Intentions: An Alternative to Fishbein. Journal of Marketing Research. 17(2) (1980), pp. 153-172.

V. Venkatesh and F. Davis, A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science. 46 (2000), pp. 186-204.

M. Fishbein and I. Ajzen, Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research. 27 (1975).

B. Sheppard, J. Hartwick, and P. Warshaw, The Theory of Reasoned Action: A Meta-Analysis of Past Research with Recommendations for Modifications and Future Research. Journal of Consumer Research. 15 (1988).

F.D. Davis, A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results, Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 1985.

I. Ajzen and M. Fishbein, The Influence of Attitudes on Behavior. (2005). pp. 173-221.

R.E. Rice and C.E. Aydin, Attitudes toward New Organizational Technology: Network Proximity as a Mechanism for Social Information Processing. Administrative Science Quarterly. 36 (1991), 219.

I. Ajzen and M. Fishbein, Attitude-Behavior Relations: A Theoretical Analysis and Review of Empirical Research. Psychological Bulletin. 84 (1977), pp. 888-918.

D.A. Adams, R.R. Nelson, and P.A. Todd, Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication. MIS Q. 16 (1992), pp. 227-247.

R. Saade and B. Bahli, The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in online learning: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. Information & Management. 42 (2005), pp. 317-327.

M. Igbaria, S.J. Schiffman, and T.J. Wieckowski, The respective roles of perceived usefulness and perceived fun in the acceptance of microcomputer technology. Behav. Inf. Technol. 13(6) (1994), pp. 349-361.

E. Karahanna and D.W. Straub, The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use. Inf. Manag. 35 (1999), pp. 237-250.

K. Karunasena and H. Deng, Critical factors for evaluating the public value of e-government in Sri Lanka. Government information quarterly. 29(1) (2012), pp. 76-84.

Y.K. Dwivedi, N.P. Rana, A. Jeyaraj, M. Clement, and M.D. Williams, Re-examining the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): Towards a revised theoretical model. Information Systems Frontiers. 21 (2019). pp. 719-734.

A. Granić and N. Marangunić, Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology. 50(5) (2019), pp. 2572-2593.

J.D. Gould and C.H. Lewis, Designing for usability: key principles and what designers think. Commun. ACM. 28 (1985), pp. 300-311.

C.-L. Hsu and H.-P. Lu, Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience. Information & Management. 41 (2004), pp. 853-868.

V. Venkatesh, Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model. Information Systems Research. 11 (2000), pp. 342-365.

V. Venkatesh and F. Davis, A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test*. Decision Sciences. 27 (2007), pp. 451-481.

D. Gefen and D. Straub, The Relative Importance of Perceived Ease of Use in IS Adoption: A Study of E-Commerce Adoption. J. AIS. 1(8) (2000).

G. Hackbarth, V. Grover, and M. Yi, Computer playfulness and anxiety: Positive and negative mediators of the system experience effect on perceived ease of use. Information & Management. 40 (2003), pp. 221-232.

F. Calisir and F. Calisir, The relation of interface usability characteristics, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use to end-user satisfaction with enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems. Computers in Human Behavior. 20 (2004), pp. 505-515.

D. Dhagarra, M. Goswami, and G. Kumar, Impact of Trust and Privacy Concerns on Technology Acceptance in Healthcare: An Indian Perspective. Int J Med Inform. 141 (2020), 104164.

S.J. Hong, What drives AI-based risk information-seeking intent? Insufficiency of risk information versus (Un)certainty of AI chatbots. Computers in Human Behavior. 162 (2025), 108460.

C.S. Burke, D.E. Sims, E.H. Lazzara, and E. Salas, Trust in leadership: A multi-level review and integration. The Leadership Quarterly. 18(6) (2007), pp. 606-632.

A. Hasija and T. Esper, In artificial intelligence (AI) we trust: A qualitative investigation of AI technology acceptance. Journal of Business Logistics. 43(3) (2022), pp. 388-412.

N.E. Wardhani, A Legal Perspective on the Antecedents of Consumer Protection in Digital Financial Services. Journal of Economics and Business. 9(1) (2024).

I. Graef and S. Van Berlo, Towards Smarter Regulation in the Areas of Competition, Data Protection and Consumer Law: Why Greater Power Should Come with Greater Responsibility. European Journal of Risk Regulation. 12(3) (2021), pp. 674-698.

G. Hackbarth, V. Grover, and M.Y. Yi, Computer playfulness and anxiety: positive and negative mediators of the system experience effect on perceived ease of use. Inf. Manag. 40 (2003), pp. 221-232.

D. McCloskey, The Importance of Ease of Use, Usefulness, and Trust to Online Consumers: An Examination of the Technology Acceptance Model with Older Customers. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing. 18 (2006), pp. 47-65.

A. Kesharwani and S. Bisht, The impact of trust and perceived risk on Internet banking adoption in India. International Journal of Bank Marketing. 30 (2012), pp. 303-322.

W. Chaouali, I. Ben Yahia, and N. Souiden, The interplay of counter-conformity motivation, social influence, and trust in customers' intention to adopt Internet banking services: The case of an emerging country. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. 28 (2016), pp. 209-218.

D. Kim, D. Ferrin, and R. Rao, A Trust-Based Consumer Decision-Making Model in Electronic Commerce: The Role of Trust, Perceived Risk, and Their Antecedents. Decision Support Systems. 44 (2008), pp. 544-564.

S. Jarvenpaa, N. Tractinsky, and M. Vitale, Consumer trust in an Internet Store. International Journal of Information Technology and Management - IJITM. 1 (2000), pp. 45-71.

E. Matemba and G. Li, Consumers' willingness to adopt and use WeChat wallet: An empirical study in South Africa. Technology in Society. 53 (2017).

J. Eiser, S. Miles, and L. Frewer, Trust, Perceived Risk, and Attitudes Toward Food Technologies1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 32 (2006), pp. 2423-2433.

D. Gefen, E. Karahanna, and D.W. Straub, Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly. (2003), p p. 51-90.

D.H. McKnight, V. Choudhury, and C. Kacmar, The impact of initial consumer trust on intentions to transact with a web site: a trust building model. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems. 11(3-4) (2002), pp. 297-323.

O. Reis, N.E. Eneh, B. Ehimuan, and A. Anyanwu, Privacy Law Challenges In The Digital Age: A Global Review of Legislation And Enforcement. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences. 6 (2024), pp. 73-88.

H. Taherdoost, Legal, Regulatory, and Ethical Considerations in E-Business. Springer. (2023). pp. 379-402.

S. Alzebda and M.A.I. Matar, Factors affecting citizen intention toward AI acceptance and adoption: the moderating role of government regulations. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal. (2024). ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print).

Ó. Williamson, The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach. AJS. 87 (1981), 548.

H. Barksdale, W. Darden, and W. Perreault, Changes In Consumer Attitudes Toward Marketing, Consumerism and Government Regulation: 1971-1975. Journal of Consumer Affairs. 10 (2005), pp. 117-139.

A.A. Alalwan, A.M. Baabdullah, N.P. Rana, and K. Tamilmani, Examining adoption of mobile internet in Saudi Arabia: Extending TAM with perceived enjoyment, innovativeness and trust. Technology in Society. 55 (2018).

F. Kanwal and M. Rehman, Factors Affecting E-Learning Adoption in Developing Countries-Empirical Evidence From Pakistan's Higher Education Sector. IEEE Access. (2017), pp. 1-1.

G.S. Howard and A.L. Mendelow, Discretionary Use of Computers: An Empirically Derived Explanatory Model*. Decision Sciences. 22(2) (1991), pp. 241-265.

I. Ajzen and M. Fishbein. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. 1980, CiNii Research.

R. Fazio and M.P. Zanna, Direct Experience and Attitude Behavior Consistency in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Academic Press. 6 (1981). pp. 161-202.

E. Karahanna, D. Straub, and N. Chervany, Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs. MIS Quarterly. 23 (1999), pp. 183-213.

A. Bhattacherjee and G. Premkumar, Understanding Changes in Belief and Attitude Toward Information Technology Usage: A Theoretical Model and Longitudinal Test. MIS Quarterly. 28 (2004), pp. 229-254.

L. Cohen, L. Manion, and K. Morrison, Research Methods in Education (8th ed.). 2017, Routledge.

J. Hair, G.T.M. Hult, C. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). 2022, SAGE Publications, Inc.

J.J. Risher, M. Sarstedt, and C.M. Ringle, A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), 2nd edition. 2016, SAGE Publications, Inc.

J.J. Risher, M. Sarstedt, and C.M. Ringle, When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review. 31(1) (2019), pp. 2-24.

H.A. Alfadda and H.S. Mahdi, Measuring students' use of zoom application in language course based on the technology acceptance model (TAM). Journal of psycholinguistic research. 50(4) (2021), pp. 883-900.

S.F. Ahmad, A. Bani, A.Y.A. Ayassrah, E. Awwad, Mahrous, M. Irshad, Y.A. Ali, M. Al-Razgan, Y. Khan, H. Han, An empirical evaluation of technology acceptance model for Artificial Intelligence in E-commerce. Heliyon. 9(8) (2023), e18349.